Awa gmat argument 2 apogee

The author argues that Apogee Company improves profitability by closing down its field offices and conducting all its operations from a single location. You have also not been able to address the non sequitur fallacy in the stimulus centralization will automatically lead to better supervision and more profitability.

GMAT Essays (AWA)

The above argument seeks to establish that Apogee is less profitable due to decentralization. People always tend to conduct business with somebody who they can see whenever they want to see.

The only way for the company to keep competitive is to keep tighter relationships with its customers and provide better and quicker services to them, but this may require Apogee Company to open more offices rather than to close most of the current offices.

It will be difficult for the company to get first-hand information and make quick decisions to fight competitors. Even if this is the case, the statement lacks any sort of legitimate evidence to strengthen the claim therefore rendering it objectionable.

The author argues that Apogee Company improves profitability by closing down Awa gmat argument 2 apogee field offices and conducting all its operations from a single location. Even though their claim may well have a merit, the business department presents a poorly and weak reasoned argument, based on several questionable premises and assumptions, and based solely on the evidence that it offers, we cannot accept their argument as valid.

Such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintains better supervision of all employees. In the first place, the author regards a complicated managerial issue as a single-step change in operations and ignores many relevant factors.

If it simply closed its current offices, the most possible result is that it loses its customers and therefore suffers even lower profitability.

Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. They have wrongly used the centralization concept. While some believe that it is efficient to have a centralized organizational structure whereas others deduce that decentralization is the solution.

There are countless other factors which constitute to the profitability of a company rather than just its organizational structure which the author fails to consider here.

You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. If the argument had backed its reasoning with real data and supporting proof then it would have sounded more convincing.

The secondary issue in the argument lies in the cost-benefit analysis. Also please tell me what approx score I may get for this. In the third place, it is senseless to compare the present operations of Apogee Company with the operations in the past.

Apogee Company may easily become another unfortunate company that is forgotten by its customers in a region where it does not have a permanent office. The above argument, though seems sound, has a number of flaws associated with it.

In sum, the author's conclusion is unfounded. Some field offices may be profitable and some may be in loss making. The tertiary issue in the argument is high probability of getting a bad publicity. The expansion of operations may, in fact, help Apogee Company to enter into new business avenues and expand its business.

The reasons could be increasing footprints, faster growth, moving into different geographies which require local presence, etc.

Gmatbusters' Weekly Quant Quiz

It can be reasonably assumed that Apogee Company is suffering a low profitability at present. It can be reasonably assumed that Apogee Company is suffering a low profitability at present.

In addition, the author points out that Apogee Company enjoyed a more profitable business in the past when it had all its operations in one location. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location.

The argument makes several assumptions which are not reliable and are not backed up by supporting data. There can be many reasons such as recession, global market turbulence, etc. Therefore, the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location.

Analysis of an Argument Questions for the GMAT® Exam Page 3 of 32 The following appeared in the opinion column of a financial magazine: “On average, middle-aged consumers devote 39 percent of their retail expenditure to department store products and. Sample Response to GMAT AWA Argument Questions.

2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company. The argument states that the Apogee company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operation from a single location to improve profit.

However this conclusion is not backed up by concrete analysis and evidence. Sample Response to GMAT AWA Argument Questions. 2. The following appeared in a memorandum from the business department of the Apogee Company. The argument need to explore the reasons why the decision to decentralize Apogee company was taken up.

The reasons could be increasing footprints, faster growth, moving into different geographies which require local presence, etc. The argument that it is essential to impose a moratorium on further immigration in order to protect the local is not coherent.

The line of reasoning presented makes several unwarranted assumptions, which inevitably lead to an illogical conclusion.

Awa gmat argument 2 apogee
Rated 4/5 based on 18 review
Apogee Company. GMAT Argument Essay. Topic | Billion Essays